Wednesday, January 3, 2018

Active users of the LIRC - December 2017




ACTIVE USERS OF THE LIRC
(December 1 to 31, 2017)

All the below Active Users are eligible for one extra library card for the month of  January 2018.


TEACHING FACULTY

Member
No of Transactions
ASST.PROF.MONIKA CHEEMA
11
ASST.PROF.SNEHAL LOPES
10
ASST.PROF.SNEHA NIKAM
10
ASST.PRO.NIKITA TIWARI
10

STUDENTS
Member
No of Transactions


BHUWAD JYOTSNA SURESH SARITA
9
MUNDUCHIRACKAL PETER RICHIE JACOB BINCY
8
AISHWARYA NAMBIAR

8
VISHAL SHETTY
8
TUSCANO ELISON MARSHAL JULIA
8
MIHIR PARIKH
8
SHAILIN SHAH
8
SHIRKE ADITI VIJAY NILIMA
7
ANTONY ALEX LEENA
7
SAYALI MARTAL
6
KHAN ARBAZ ANWAR TAHSIN
6
D'CRUZ JENNY JEROLD MARY
6
DOGRA MANMOHAN NEK RAM SUNITA
6
POOJA NAIR
6
TEJASWARARAO MOTAMARRI
6
BHATT PARTH CHYAVAN VAISHALI
6
MUKRI ABDUS SAMAD MUBEEN AHMED TAHSEEN
6
LOBO DANIEL IVAN PATRICIA
6
JESDIN RAPHAEL PHILO
6
MULLA MASIRA NIZAMUDDIN MUSARRAT
6
GUDDI TYAGI
6
GUPTA PRADEEP FULCHAND RENU
6
CRASTA RYAN RONALD LEENA
6
KOTIAN SAHIL UDAYA SHALINI
6
PATIL SHUBHAM SUJAN ASHA
6
PINTO GLEN JOHNSON LEENA
6
DHRUV MEHTA
6
ACHAREKAR MANDAR VASANT PRACHI
6
SINGH SATYAM RAJNARAYAN MAYA
6
JITALI KAMAT
6
MICHELLE ALVA
5
SURVE SAHIL SANJAY DIPTI
5
SONALI PARAB
5
VINIT NEOGI
5
PRAMODKUMAR YADAV
5
DIVYA PANDIT
5
RAJESH PARSHURAM PRASAD
5
YADAV ANKIT KUMAR RAMESHWAR PRASAD SHIVKALIDEVI
5
SONI SHIVANI ASHIT SONAL ASHIT SONI
5
CHAVAN POOJA SANTOSH SUPRIYA
5
PARTH BHODIA
5
OFF.EXECUTIVE.ANILA ELIZABETH JOHN
5
KELVIN ALOYSIUS CASTELLINO
5
BISHT SHIVANI MEHARBAN SINGH BISHT BIMLA BISHT
5
JERIN VARGHESE ANNIE VARGHESE
5
DEEPIKA SENGUPTA
5
DIXITA SURTI
5
NISHITA ASOLKAR
5
SOKHI GURMAN KAUR AMRITPAL SINGH JASBIR KAUR
5
CHAVAN ANKITA JEEVAN SARITA JEEVAN CHAVAN
5
DARSHANA BIRADAR
5
AKASH DABHI
5
AANCHAL SATYAN P.
5
GOKARN CHINMAY SUHAS ANJALI
5
NEVGI ANIRUDDHA VIVEK VIDYA VIVEK NEVGI
5
SHAIKH NAMEERA MOHAMMAD ZAHID NASIYA SHAIKH
5


Tuesday, December 19, 2017

Why Employers Must Stop Requiring College Degrees For Middle-Skill Jobs

Employers are guilty of "degree inflation," requiring lofty academic bona fides for jobs that don't really need them. Joseph Fuller says the practice is hurting American competitiveness.

To read the full article:
https://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/why-employers-must-stop-requiring-college-degrees-for-middle-skill-jobs?cid=wk-rss

Tuesday, December 5, 2017

Active users of the LIRC - Novermber 2017

ACTIVE USERS OF THE LIRC

(Novermber 1 - 30, 2017)

Following  Active Users are eligible for one extra library card for the month of  December  2017.

Sr. No. Member No's.
1 AKASH DABHI 13
2 MAURYA NITIN BRIJALAL PHOOLANDEVI 12
3 RACHEL ALMEIDA 11
4 HRISHIKESH MAHESH TELANG 11
5 SHAH HET CHETAN SEJAL 11
6 SHANBHAG ANUSHREE ANIL VEENA 10
7 SAWANT SHIVANI SANDEEP SUMEDHA 10
8 SONALI PARAB 10
9 RAUT SAURABH PRAKASH VIDYA 10
10 DIXITA SURTI 10
11 KAUSTUBH PRABHU 10
12 NEVGI ANIRUDDHA VIVEK VIDYA VIVEK NEVGI 10
13 GUDDI TYAGI 10
14 SAYALI MARTAL 9
15 SHETH MANAN PRAKASH MEENA 9
16 SHRUTI SURESHAN RAJANI 9
17 STEPHINA RODNEY D'SOUZA 9
18 ASST.PROF.MONIKA PAL 9
19 MADHAV JANI 9

Monday, November 27, 2017

ANNUAL LIBRARY FEEDBACK SURVEY 2017


LIRC@SFIT HAS ALL THE RESOURCES FOR MY COURSES OF STUDY

       AGREE?
DISAGREE?
SOMEWHERE IN BETWEEN?

LET US KNOW!


TAKE THE QUICK ANNUAL LIBRARY FEEDBACK SURVEY AT



Wednesday, November 1, 2017

Active users of the LIRC - October 2017

Image result for congratulations

ACTIVE USERS OF THE LIRC
(October 1 - 31, 2017)
Following  Active Users are eligible for one extra library card for the month of  November 2017.
Sr. No.
Member
No. of Transactions
1
SHAILIN SHAH
15
2
VATSAL SOLANKI
14
3
NEVGI ANIRUDDHA VIVEK VIDYA VIVEK NEVGI
14
4
SHRUTI SURESHAN RAJANI
14
5
AISHWARYA NAMBIAR
14
6
SAYALI MARTAL
13
7
PINTO CALVIN CRAIG SAVIO ELAINE
13
8
SUPRITH UCHIL
13
9
RISHABH DUBEY
13
10
SONALI PARAB
12
11
JAYBHAY SHEETAL SHANTILAL MANISHA
12
12
CRASTA RYAN RONALD LEENA
12
13
HRISHIKESH MAHESH TELANG
12
14
MORAES ROSHAL SURESH LILLY
12
15
ANTONY ALEX LEENA
12
16
RAJESH PARSHURAM PRASAD
11
17
JOSHI SHUBHAM PRAMOD VINITA
11
18
TEJASWARARAO MOTAMARRI
11

Friday, October 13, 2017

Publishers and societies take action against Research Gate’s copyright infringements

Publishers and societies take action against Research Gate’s copyright infringements

Following unsuccessful attempts to jointly find ways for scholarly collaboration network ResearchGate to run its service in a copyright-compliant way, a coalition of information analytics businesses, publishers and societies is now left with no other choice but to take formal steps to remedy the illicit hosting of millions of subscription articles on the ResearchGate site.
Exchanging research and collaborating has been an integral part of academic work for centuries. Today, cooperation across geographic boundaries and disciplines has become easier than ever with online tools making connections in real-time, opening up infinite ways for breakthrough discoveries. These are true achievements and publishers of academic research welcome them and have helped to facilitate them.

To read more, visit http://www.responsiblesharing.org/coalition-statement/ (accessed on October 13, 2017)

Copy + Paste = Delete

Copy + Paste = Delete

No more copying or padding up assignments with information off the net. A new UGC guideline asks institutions to set up committees to cross check for copying

THOUGH PLAGIARISM WILL NOW BE PUNISHABLE UNDER THE NEW UGC GUIDELINES, IT IS NOT A LEGAL OFFENCE
It starts with copying homework from a classmate at school because you were too lazy to do yours. Then you begin copying a few lines from Wikipedia to pad up an assignment.
For a disturbingly large number of Indian students, plagiarism – the practice of taking someone else’s idea or work and passing it as your own – is part of academic life. It’s ignored by school and college until almost the post-graduate level, where regulations are stricter.
Now, the University Grants Commission (UGC) is taking active steps to promote academic integrity and prevent plagiarism in academics. A set of rules drafted last month make it necessary for higher education institutes across the country to set up an Academic Misconduct Panel to investigate assignments and projects submitted, for plagiarism.
The panel will comprise faculty, MPhil (master of philosophy) and PhD (doctor of philosophy) students. “Every student submitting a thesis, dissertation, term papers, reports or any other such documents to the higher education institution shall submit an undertaking indicating that the document has been prepared by him or her and that the document is his/her original work and free of any plagiarism,” reads the draft.
The draft also recommends that institutes conduct awareness programmes each semester to teach students and staff the importance of proper attribution of information, seeking permission of the author where necessary, acknowledgement of source compatible with the needs and specificities of disciplines.
Teachers welcome the move. “The education system gives Indian students very little time to research,” believes Kanchana Mahadevan, head of the department of philosophy at Mumbai University. Students end up not realising that they need to use the right sources and credit it when using material from the web and another person’s work. As Uday Salunkhe, group director of WeSchool, Matunga puts it, “Most students have no idea of the seriousness of the consequences. It has become the new normal.”
WHOSE LINE IS IT ANYWAY?
When Raj*, 23, was writing an essay to get admission in a humanities course in the UK, he took a couple of paragraphs from an essay online to impress the university with his language skills. “I figured that universities abroad get thousands of applications and won’t have no time to check mine for plagiarism,” he says. “I was terribly wrong. I got caught and was blacklisted from the university and lost a year. I learnt my lesson the hard way.”
Mahadevan of Mumbai University has encountered student plagiarism on a few occasions. “The students in these cases were looking for short-cuts [since they had not attended class regularly] and instant appreciation,” she says. “They didn’t even realise that plagiarism is ethically unacceptable.” It was only during classroom presentation of the assignments, when their peers presented creative and original work, that they realized what they had done.
It is a major problem, especially in medical colleges, says Dr TP Lahane, dean of Grant Medical College, Byculla. “Several students just copy the entire research paper at post-graduate level and submit it,” he says. “When found, they are punished. In most cases though, it’s difficult to know because they are just too many open sources of research both online and offline.”
Though the menace will now be punishable under the UGC guidelines, it is not a legal offence, says Mahesh Bhagnari, managing director at Bhagnari and Co, patent and trademark law firm in Fort. “For somebody to file a suit against you for plagiarism, you should have used the copy for commercial use and earned a profit, which students don’t do. Also, the laws are enforced on citizens above 18 years of age and undergraduates are often younger.”
It means that colleges and universities have the bulk of the responsibility to take action against plagiarism.
SMALL STEPS
Appropriating another person’s work was never very difficult, says Matthew Raggett, headmaster of The Doon School in Dehradun. “I attribute it to the curriculum that focuses on content and does not teach you to ask questions and find answers to them on your own,” he says. His solution: Start early. “It is important that academic honesty is enforced upon students in secondary schools saving them from resorting to plagiarism in high school and college.”
Delhi University does not receive many complaints against copied theses and assignments. But it uses software that students and staff can use to check plagiarism, says Deepika Bhaskar, deputy dean of research at the university. Each department has password-protected access to it and it scans all submitted assignments before they are sent for correction. All the papers at post-graduate level come with a certificate stating what percentage of matter is similar to what is already available in the public domain.
“Hence to create awareness about the menace, we have made announcements in all the departments to check all assignments for plagiarism,” says Bhaskar.
Dr Lahana is optimistic about the UGC guidelines. “They will encourage institutes to ensure that a thesis, dissertation, term paper, report, publication or any other documents is free of plagiarism,” he says.
Around the world, schools and colleges have been relying on Turnitin, a programme that crosschecks academic material for plagiarism. Scanned documents show how much of the text, images or research has already appeared elsewhere. At India International School in Bengaluru, Selina Krishnan, director of academics goes a step ahead. “We guide students on how to acknowledge and cite what has been taken from a source they have researched,” she says. “With proper guidelines in place, plagiarism can be avoided.”

Source: Hindustan Times dated October 11, 2017

Featured Posts

Top Searches from “IEEE Xplore Digital Library" - 13th September 2024

  The Learning and Information Resource Centre is pleased to inform you about the Top Searches from  "  IEEE   Xplore   Digital Library...